X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD,INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD,L_SPAM_TOOL_13,TW_CG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:24:39 +0159
From: Denis Excoffier <cygwin AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Three snapshots yesterday!
Message-ID: <20111021082503.GA5192@po8371>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello,

Three snapshots yesterday! Great!

However, i discovered an irregularity for the last one:

The cvs change by cgf dated 2011-10-20 21:35:59
with Log message:
        * fhandler.h (fhandler*::copyto): Free path_conv strings first.
        * path.h (cfree_and_null): Rename and expand from cfree_maybe.
        (path_conv &operator =): Call free_strings rather than freeing strings
        directly.

is included in the sources (cygwin-src-20111020.tar.bz2) and the
"Diff since 2011-10-17 (49k)" but it is not mentionned in the
"ChangeLog since 2011-10-17 (2k)" (and also not mentionned in
the winsup/cygwin/ChangeLog inside the sources). For the binaries
(cygwin-inst-20111020.tar.bz2) i cannot say.

Is this under control?

Best regards,

Denis Excoffier.



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple