X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:20:43 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Performance issue in SFTP , CygWin Server Message-ID: <20111005162043.GA7915@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <32595286 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32595286.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Oct 5 06:41, BhavyaMadiri wrote: > > Our application downloads files from various source systems to our server. We > have Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5.5 with Advanced Platform version on > our server. Windows sources system (SRC1) , has Windows Server 2003 on their > server that hosts Cygwin. They recently moved from FTP to SFTP. They are > using Cygwin to support SFTP on Windows. The Cygwin setup version is 2.738. > > During sFTP load testing with SRC1, we encountered significant performance > issue. Transferring 120K files of total size 58GB takes 4.5 hours using FTP > but it takes 28 hours using SFTP. I'd always expect some performance hit when using sftp compared to ftp, in the order of 8 to 12 hours in your scenario, but 28 hours sounds a lot compared to 4.5 hours. What network connection do you have from your client to SRC1? Gigabit ethernet? Are the 58 Gigs files located on a local disk, or are they on a remote fileserver? If remote, what server and what underlying protocol, SMB or NFS? > We have not encountered any performance problems with downloading files > (same number and size ) from unix/linux systems using SFTP. > > We suspect this performance issue to be related to Cygwin. Unfortunately we don't know your Cygwin you're using on SRC1. Please send a cygcheck -svr output as per http://cygwin.com/problems.html Did you try a recent Cygwin snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ ? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple