X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_CG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4E8B193D.4000700@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:33:33 +0200 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.9 Missing SIGPIPE? References: <4E833CB4 DOT 3060004 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4E8B0FC6 DOT 9050600 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4E8B116D DOT 3030905 AT gmail DOT com> <20111004140927 DOT GC20825 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20111004140927.GC20825@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/4/2011 4:09 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 04:00:13PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 10/4/2011 3:53 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> Peter Rosin skrev 2011-09-28 17:26: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> When I use bash to build pipelines, they sometimes don't finish but >>>> instead some process remains running. Example: >>>> >>>> $ tail -f -n 10000 log.txt | grep . | head -n 2 >>>> >>>> Almost instantly I get the expected two lines of output, but no prompt >>>> back. I have to use ctrl-c. If I don't ctrl-c I can run pstree in >>>> another terminal and see this: >>>> >>>> $ pstree >>>> ??????????mintty?????????bash?????????tail >>>> ??????mintty?????????bash?????????pstree >>> >>> This example is a poor one, as tail simply waits for a new line, when it >>> gets a new line it forwards it to the pipe and promptly receives a >>> SIGPIPE as grep is not there anymore. >>> >>> I'll get back when I have distilled a better STC. If I can... >> >> Hi Peter, >> are you referring on something like SIGHUP on PTY closure ? >> >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-07/msg00295.html >> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/close.html > > Note that this thread contains your assertion that something isn't > happening correctly but it isn't clear that your analysis is correct. > > But, no, SIGPIPE != SIGHUP and the above example clearly shows a > completely different scenario than what is described in the above > thread. > > cgf Hi Cgf, I know that SIGPIPE != SIGHUP, but Peter mentioned that the example is not really representative of the PIPE problem he found, so eventually he catched the same problem I saw on mc. Of course, it could be a different one. Referring to the SIGHUP thread This portion of the standard, if I am not wrong, it is not currently implemented in cygwin: "If fildes refers to the master side of a pseudo-terminal, and this is the last close, a SIGHUP signal shall be sent to the controlling process, if any, for which the slave side of the pseudo-terminal is the controlling terminal. It is unspecified whether closing the master side of the pseudo-terminal flushes all queued input and output." The workaround I implemented in mc was to send the SIGHUP to the subshell, before mc exit, instead on relying on cygwin to do it. Am I misundestanding the standard ? Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple