X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <32584519.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:20:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Girod To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION In-Reply-To: <32579564.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <32557806 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <32579564 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com jan.kolar wrote: > > If you do not succeed with snapshots (I'm curious to know), > Thanks for your help, and sorry to disappoint you: I cannot afford in the current situation to invest the time and effort to learn to install snapshots, build debuggable versions, and actively compare fixes. I can see that the understanding is in a good shape and light is at the end of the tunnel. I'll be happy to wait for a fix in an official version. Thanks again! Marc -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION-tp32557806p32584519.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple