X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SARE_SUB_MINUTES,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: date is off of system clock by about 9 minutes Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:34:38 -0400 Lines: 14 Message-ID: <24u287pde8aam11ap6nba6i3n92do8p6e9@4ax.com> References: <7f11875iun9ve00e3d598kneo19s7m0v23 AT 4ax DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Andrew Schulman writes: > > > Both 'date' and 'ls' show times that are ahead of the system clock by about 9 > > > minutes, 24 seconds. > > > > I just ran rebaseall for other reasons (bzr again), and now the problem has > > disappeared. > > Check the archives for why the problem occurs; it's been brought up before. But > stopping all Cygwin processes, as one does for rebaseall, causes 'date' and > system clock to be in sync again in new Cygwin processes afterwards. So you've > coincidentally done the exact fix required. Be happy. Thanks. It took a while but I found the explanation at http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-03/msg00838.html. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple