X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4E801B9A.4060002@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:28:42 +0200
From: Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: rebaseall and cygstdc++-6.dll
References: <4E6AC3F4 DOT 1090401 AT gmail DOT com>	<4E7EC532 DOT 9020306 AT gmail DOT com>	 <CAGHJv4fk9m_eqg6Gv+UezzUFD5sNuw9yzu-fUNeaO9nG+9zjeA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <4E7FD234 DOT 70102 AT gmail DOT com> <1317006915 DOT 8692 DOT 1 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To: <1317006915.8692.1.camel@YAAKOV04>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 9/26/2011 5:15 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 02:15 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>    The problem is in binutils, and the fact that it generates base relocs for
>> entries from EH data that should be just ignored.
>>
>>    http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-09/msg00174.html
>> contains more detail, if you want to ask more let's do it on the binutils list.
>>
>>    So to answer your question: the gcc language-specific runtime DLLs have to
>> be built using the patched version of binutils, otherwise they break when they
>> get rebased; that's why I'm rebuilding the gcc packages - having already
>> locally rebuilt binutils.  This will only be a big issue for anyone who wants
>> to rebuild gcc from source themselves, the new packages I upload to the distro
>> will still work for everyone regardless of what binutils they have installed
>> and/or how or when or where they get rebased.
>
> Except that this issue doesn't affect only libstdc++, but any C++
> library which throws exceptions (as I have seen on my system).  So we
> really do need a patched binutils ASAP.
>

There is an easy way to identify such libraries ?
Just to know if I need to rebuild some of mines .

>
> Yaakov
>

Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple