X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E7EC532.9020306@gmail.com> References: <4E6AC3F4 DOT 1090401 AT gmail DOT com> <4E7EC532 DOT 9020306 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:31:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rebaseall and cygstdc++-6.dll From: Chris Sutcliffe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8PKVd2t006558 On 25 September 2011 02:07, Dave Korn wrote: >  I finally nailed this one down.  Stray base relocs against references to > symbols in discarded COMDAT sections remaining in the .eh_frame data cause the > stack unwind lookup to get lost.  Sourceware CVS is down right now but I'll be > sending the attached to binutils when it's working again, and I've started > building a 4.5.3-3 release. I'm confused, is the issue in binutils or gcc? If the issue is in binutils, is rebuilding gcc going to help? Either way, glad you nailed it! Thank you, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple