X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:33:09 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: grantpt, unlockpt bug Message-ID: <20110921043309.GA2676@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4E791796 DOT 90909 AT redhat DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E791796.90909@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:45:42PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >Bruno Haible reported that grantpt and unlockpt report success even on >invalid fds. This program fails the assertion at line 7: > >#include >#include >#include >#include >int main (void) >{ > assert (grantpt (-1) == -1); > assert (errno == EBADF); > errno = 0; > assert (grantpt (99) == -1); > assert (errno == EBADF); > return 0; >} I checked in a simple fix for this. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple