X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:32:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: plotting from octave: address space already occupied, fork aborts Message-ID: <20110915013208.GA21925@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4E703F00 DOT 8020101 AT gmail DOT com> <4E709C95 DOT 3070600 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <4E709F16 DOT 2050002 AT gmail DOT com> <20110914150242 DOT GA6836 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4E71166C DOT 6050808 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E71166C.6050808@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:02:36PM +0200, Marco atzeri wrote: >On 9/14/2011 5:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Why do we need to add an arbitrary new extension here? Why isn't >>octave using "dll"? "oct" is certainly not a standard extension for a >>shared library. > >octave is using .oct on all platforms including linux > >upstream choice, no specific difference for cygwin Maybe they should be called ".dll" on Cygwin then. Either that or we need to come up with some way for packages to register their idiosyncratic shared library extensions with rebaseall. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple