X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-id: <4E701CAB.50906@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:16:59 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Cygwin too slow while installing and working References: <4E6F1F46 DOT 6040600 AT gmail DOT com> <4E6F29B4 DOT 4020705 AT lmco DOT com> <4E6F308A DOT 2050008 AT gmail DOT com> In-reply-to: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 9/13/2011 6:53 AM, Joćo Moreira wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Marco atzeri wrote: >> On 9/13/2011 12:00 PM, Damon Register wrote: >>> >>> On 9/13/2011 5:15 AM, Marco atzeri wrote: >>>> >>>> On 9/13/2011 10:26 AM, Joćo Moreira wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Tried installing to a directory with no whitespaces (C:\) but got the >>>>> same results. >>>>> >>>> >>>> try a path without space >>>> C:\Program Files (x86)\Cygwin >>>> >>>> like >>>> c:\cygwin >>> >>> Did I miss something here? I thought Joćo's post just said he did >>> without space. Did I misunderstand? >>> >>> Damon Register >> >> the cygcheck.out says differently: >> >> Found: C:\Program Files (x86)\Cygwin\bin\awk >> -> C:\Program Files (x86)\Cygwin\bin\gawk.exe >> >> so or it is not the last one or something is wrong >> >> Marco >> > > Hello everyone, > I should have been clearer: The cygcheck.out I provided is the one > from the first instalation. > Right now I have cygwin installed at C:\cygwin, and giving the same > results (very slow). > In attach I send the newest cygcheck.out. Please note that this time I > did not install everything (I skiped some editors and other > non-essential stuff). > I did however removed Avira and ran rebaseall again. The root causes requiring rebasing as a fix shouldn't result in slow performance. Nothing obvious from your cygcheck output. It really does sound like some kind of BLODA to me. Perhaps look around for other things that are interfering. Procmon might help you pin this offending software down. Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple