X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4E5F3BB8.8070906@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:00:56 +1000
From: Luke Kendall <luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
CC: audit <audit-mail-disclaimer AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
Subject: Re: Cygwin package naming?
References: <4E5EE340 DOT 6010009 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <4E5EE593 DOT 1080009 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5EE593.1080009@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 9:43 PM, Luke Kendall wrote:
>> Can someone with some official Cygwin standing tell me how the Cygwin
>> package names correspond with the "official" names of the packages, 
>> chosen
>> by the package owners? In other words, how are the Cygwin package names
>> determined? (My hope is that the "official" name is used, possibly with
>> "cygwin" added to it in some form.)
>
> Sorry, I have no badge and gun but perhaps I will do.
>
>> I'm asking because I'm finding Cygwin packages that contain no license
>> information, at least in the compiled form (e.g. gawk, libiconv2). So 
>> I'm
>> thinking that in such cases, I can modify my Cygwin license-finding 
>> script
>> to look up the package by name on freshmeat and try to find the 
>> license from
>> there.
>>
>> But that is pointless if the Cygwin package name may have the same 
>> name as a
>> freshmeat package, but is in fact some other software.
>
> How about <http://cygwin.com/setup.html>?
>

Thanks!  Yes, I think that should be enough (it certainly looks like a 
public statement of Cygwin's package naming policy, so that's good 
enough for me):

"Package file naming

Package naming scheme: use the vendor's version plus a release suffix 
for ports of existing packages"


> Aside: I had to muster all my strength to keep from using the phrase "Use
> the source Luke!"  I expect you never tire of that. ;-)
>
>

Ah, yes, very true.  Not to mention when I eat with my fingers ("Use the 
forks, Luke!").

Thanks, Larry!

luke


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple