X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 01:11:36 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.9: static const std::string initialization lost in child process when using fork, dlopen Message-ID: <20110822051136.GB25705@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1558100995 DOT 357508 DOT 1313927301638 DOT JavaMail DOT fmail AT mwmweb008> <20110821165001 DOT GA19565 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4E513BF4 DOT 90308 AT hones DOT org DOT uk> <20110821183857 DOT GC19565 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <1313961316 DOT 31093 DOT 28 DOT camel AT asus> <20110821221923 DOT GA30284 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <1313970991 DOT 31093 DOT 46 DOT camel AT asus> <20110822014409 DOT GA7051 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <1313985428 DOT 31093 DOT 48 DOT camel AT asus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1313985428.31093.48.camel@asus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:57:08PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote: >On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 21:44 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >You are confusing me with the original poster. I just attempted to >duplicate either of your results. You're right. I was confusing you with the original poster. The sentiment is the same, however. Lets move on. >> Please read what I said above: "when linking the DLL", not when >> linking *with*. So put the -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base on the >> line which produces the dll. > >I still get the stackdump... > >I will watch for a resolution... I just tried the test case with 1.7.9. I do sometimes (and sometimes not) see a "child:Test" from the child but I also get a stackdump. So my initial suggestion to use a snapshot is probably the best solution. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple