X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:33:29 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: v*printf functions not available with g++ -std=c++0x Message-ID: <20110818143329.GQ27614@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4E4BD899 DOT 4070409 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E4BD899.4070409@cs.utoronto.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Aug 17 11:04, Ryan Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using the experimental gcc-4.5 package and hit a strange error: > c++0x mode suppresses the definition of the v*printf() family of > functions in stdio.h in c++0x mode. The offending code seems to be: > > #if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) > #ifndef _REENT_ONLY > ... > int _EXFUN(vsnprintf, (char *, size_t, const char *, __VALIST) > _ATTRIBUTE ((__format__ (__printf__, 3, 0)))); > ... > #endif > #endif > > Running `g++ -std=c++0x -dM -E' indicates that __STRICT_ANSI__ is > defined while _REENT_ONLY and __STDC_VERSION__ are not. > > Oddly, functions like _vsnprintf_r are still available for some > strange reason (aren't they extensions?). I hope this is a bug > rather than a requirement of the new standard; meanwhile, using > std=gnu++0x works around the problem. If I try that with Yaakov's 4.5.3 cross compilers, then __STRICT_ANSI__ is not defined with -std=c__0x, unless I also specify `-ansi' on the command line. However, there's a weird warning: $ i686-pc-cygwin-g++ -std=c++0x -dM -E - < /dev/null | grep ANSI cc1: warning: command line option "-std=c++0x" is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for C Well, sure, that's why I called g++, not gcc... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple