X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:29:15 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: git-svn hang starting with 20110721 snapshot.
Message-ID: <20110804082915.GC12063@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20110803084427 DOT GA999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110803134528 DOT GA27354 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110803140013 DOT GA27420 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110803180231 DOT GA481 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4E399617 DOT 7020900 AT acm DOT org> <20110803190314 DOT GB18612 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1312401761 DOT 7008 DOT 17 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20110803201952 DOT GC18612 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4E39B056 DOT 6020200 AT acm DOT org> <4E39B2C9 DOT 3060607 AT acm DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E39B2C9.3060607@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug  3 13:42, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 8/3/2011 1:32 PM, David Rothenberger wrote:
> > On 8/3/2011 1:19 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> Other than that I don't have an answer for you.  There's only
> >> so much you can do within the 32 bit address space.  That's only one
> >> reason why a 64 bit Cygwin would be a good idea.
> > 
> > What was the motivation for putting the heap and mmaps above 0x80000000?
> > Was there not enough space for them below? Would there be enough space
> > below if all the DLLs were above?
> 
> Rereading this, I realized it sounds a little snotty. I'm not trying to
> second guess your decision; I was just curious. Feel free to ignore the
> question. :)

Naah, never mind.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple