X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_CG,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4E3A3732.7070003@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:07:46 +0200 From: Marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Commands slow in wait_sig. References: ,<20110803131828 DOT GA22371 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/4/2011 3:59 AM, texas salsa wrote: > >> Nothing in the above indicates that there is a problem in wait_sig. >> The delta times in an strace do not mean "This is how long an operation >> took". They just indicate the number of microseconds since the last >> update to strace output. >> >> What the above says is: >> >> 1) wait_sig is about to call ReadFile. It has been 9743 microseconds >> since strace last reported anytinng. >> >> 2) There was a lag of 342445 microseconds before something happened in >> main. That could be symptomatic of the problem which the 8/01 snapshot >> works around. Or not. >> >> If it is only happening on one system that obviously points to BLODA. >> >> cgf >> > > > Hi, > > Marco, cgf, Thanks for the reply. > > I don't use bash-completion. > $ cygcheck -cd bash-completion > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version > $ > I do use symantec antivirus which is in the BLODA list. I disabled it and observed a little performance improvement. > > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:55 2011 > 1 Thu Aug 4 09:41:56 2011 > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:57 2011 > 1 Thu Aug 4 09:41:58 2011 > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:41:59 2011 > 1 Thu Aug 4 09:42:00 2011 > 2 Thu Aug 4 09:42:01 2011 > > > But not dramatically. Other PCs I have also have symantec antivirus and no problem. Also in the problem PC symantec antivirus > had been installed from the beginning and no performance issue was seen before. So I doubt symantec is the main contributor > to the command delay. But since no other systems with the same dll level do no see the problem, I think it is possible there > may be other software that interfares cygwin's work. Is there any good way to find a specific BLODA that is having main effect > to my PC? > > Regards, > Yuta the only real way is to remove the software and check for improvment. Antivirus are bad beasts, in one case I saw the disabled AV worst than the active one. Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple