X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:06:11 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problems with 20110801 snapshot
Message-ID: <20110803070611.GF5647@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1312351271 DOT 2316 DOT 8 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1312351271.2316.8.camel@YAAKOV04>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug  3 01:01, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> I am having the following issues with the 20110801 snapshot:
> 
> * Previously I had my DLLs rebased from 0x80000000 up, but now, all
> fork() calls failed until I rebased from 0xffff0000 down.

Yes, that was to be expected.  Sorry about that.  However, since DLLs
will stay in the range below 0x80000000 by default anyway, I was mulling
over a way to utilize the large address area.  And then it occured to me
that it's the ideal playfield for the heap.  See
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2011-q3/msg00032.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2011-q3/msg00033.html

> * Opening multiple VTE-based terminals (gnome-terminal, Xfce Terminal,
> etc.), or even one after a mintty terminal is already open, produces the
> following message when starting a bash login shell:
> 
> > -bash: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > -bash: no job control in this shell
> 
> In which case, launching a ncurses app (e.g. less or nano) displays on
> the first terminal which didn't have such a warning.  And when closing
> such a terminal, a warning about a process still running in that
> terminal appears even though there is none.

Is that a new one in 20110801?  The change set doesn't look like it
could introduce this.  Can you please look which snapshot introduced
this issue?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple