X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4E3862EA.9070000@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:49:46 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sshd failes allocating /dev/tty[0-9] References: <4E36CB68 DOT 3000606 AT ank-sia DOT com> <4E36D731 DOT 2090104 AT ank-sia DOT com> <4E37E062 DOT 1010508 AT ank-sia DOT com> In-reply-to: <4E37E062.1010508@ank-sia.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/2/2011 7:32 AM, Alexey Luchko wrote: >>> Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics atteched. > > > > Maybe crank up the debugging flags to maximum? I assume sshd is still > > stopped from your last run of sshd -d. If that doesn't sound right to > > you, you may want to investigate why it's not running now. > > sshd was stopped while that run because it did not login anyway. and still > don't. sshd will run even if you're having problems connecting to it. I'm just making sure that you are testing with a running server. If not, then you want to make sure the server is running first. > The messages > >>> debug1: Allocating pty. > >>> debug1: session_pty_req: session 0 alloc /dev/tty2 > >>> chown(/dev/tty2, 11135, 10513) failed: Bad file descriptor > >>> debug1: do_cleanup > >>> debug1: session_pty_cleanup: session 0 release /dev/tty2 > were got running sshd -d in console. I was suggesting that you run sshd with all the debug flags (i.e. "-d -d -d") to see if you'd get more useful information about your problem. > I have no clue. It look like the /dev is virtual fs for chown and real for > ls. But both are from cygwin: > """ > $ which chown ls > /usr/bin/chown > /usr/bin/ls /dev is a virtual. See: -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple