X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:45:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.10s 20110729 - problem listing services in /proc Message-ID: <20110730054505.GA21632@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4E3302E5 DOT 6000602 AT acm DOT org> <20110729202142 DOT GD13084 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1311979011 DOT 3972 DOT 13 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4E33372A DOT 2010009 AT acm DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E33372A.2010009@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:41:46PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: >On 7/29/2011 3:36 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:21 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Jul 29 11:58, David Rothenberger wrote: >>>> With the 20110729 snapshot (and some earlier ones), the following >>>> command terminates early. >>>> >>>> % find /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/CurrentControlSet/services -maxdepth 1 -print >>>> >>>> strace lists an exception: "exception C0000005 at 6100296A". This is >>>> occurring for me in both Win7 x64 and WinXP x86. It doesn't occur in >>>> either environment using 1.7.9. >>> >>> I can't reproduce this. Address 6100296A points to a double free on >>> the cygheap, alternativly an overwritten memeory slot on the cygheap. >>> Without being able to duplicate the problem it's rather hard to find. >>> Can you try earlier snapshots to find out in what timeframe this >>> problem has been introduced? An strace might be helpful as well. >> >> I did have C0000005 exceptions with the 20110729 snapshot with seemingly >> all fork() calls, which I don't have with 1.7.9. I'm running Win7 SP1 >> x64 with large-address-aware executables and DLLs rebased above >> 0x80000000. I won't be able to diagnose this further until after the >> weekend. > >For what it's worth, I was also running the 20110729 snapshot on Win7 >SP1 x64 with large-address-aware executables and DLLs rebased above >0x80000000, and this was the only regular problem I was seeing. I don't see this on either XP x86 or WIN 7 x86_64. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple