X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4E330DC6.4070009@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:45:10 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Portable shell code between Cygwin and Linux References: <80hb65b3ue DOT fsf AT somewhere DOT org> In-reply-to: <80hb65b3ue.fsf@somewhere.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 7/29/2011 9:42 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Here, I cd first to my config file, as I removed full paths from client.vpn > config file: > I'm aware of cygpath, but still don't see clearly which are the best trade-off > to be able to write portable shell code -- if possible. Any hint? Sounds to me like you're using a Windows version of OpenVPN. You'd need a version built for Cygwin to make this transparent. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple