X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Heiko Elger Subject: Re: Slow performance Win7/64 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20110729092602 DOT GB19240 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello, Corinna Vinschen writes: > > The slowdown of the code was the result of a patch which was supposed > to fix a potential race condition. Jojelino's patch looks nice, but > it might reintroduce a new race. Handle with care. Oops - what king of race condition do you mean. OK - that's a new information for me. So the current slow implementation is a workaround for another race condition. So - is there no other way for fixing that race contion! Is there another implememtaion for fixing the slow signaling without getting a new race condition. Heiko -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple