X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Heiko Elger Subject: Re: Slow performance Win7/64 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello jojelino, I just rebuild cygwin1.dll latest snapshot. > I believe the attached patch workarounds delayed wait_sig problem. Yes - it works fine! > This yielded speed improvement. i ran your testcase and same timestamp > recorded 35. approx 2x speed. XP/32 Win7/64 cygwin snapshot 2011-07-21 34 12 cygwin snapshot 2011-07-21 SIGPATCH 44 37 As you see XP and Win7 now a really faster. Win7 3x speed - wow. > but i can't make sure it doesn't include side-effects. please test it on > your pc. let's hope it would work. I will test ist. I've already recognize one positive side effect: The CTRL-C Handler works now even faster. With unpatched cygwin1.dll there was a realy long delay, after pressing CTRL-C. Can you agree this too? I'm very interested if this patch will be released or not. I'm interested in the opionion opinion of C. Vinschen and C Faylor. best regards heiko -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple