X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BQ,TW_IB,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Qt Creator & static libqt-mt.a From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:43:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1310452987.8576.47.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 20:33 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote: > Qt Creator is not part of Cygwin? Not currently, but it is available in Ports. > Furthermore having a static version of the Qt library would save > everybody a lot of trouble Why? A static Qt means no plugins, which is pretty worthless. > (both Qt3 and Qt4). Qt3 has been deprecated for years, is no longer supported, and will likely be removed from the distro relatively soon. Yaakov Cygwin/X -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple