X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:08:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: brltty problems with recent snapshots (was Re: Emacs and removal of CYGWIN=tty) Message-ID: <20110711000843.GB31884@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4E0C62D6 DOT 3060901 AT cornell DOT edu> <20110630115403 DOT GH4471 AT const DOT bordeaux DOT inria DOT fr> <20110630140836 DOT GG9552 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110706071951 DOT GC23717 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110706085340 DOT GQ1457 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110706152740 DOT GB29906 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:31:28AM +0200, Lars Bj?rndal wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: > >> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:08:26PM +0200, Lars Bj?rndal wrote: >>>[Corinna] >>> >>>> On Jul 6 10:03, Lars Bj?rndal wrote: >>>>> [Corinna Vinschen] >>>>> >>>>> > What I don't get from your reply is if you are comparing the latest >>>>> > snapshot against 1.7.9 with CYGWIN=tty mode, or if you're comparing >>>>> > to another snapshot in default console mode. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, I'm sorry. Tested against the 1.7.9 version. >>>> >>>> In CYGWIN=tty or CYGWIN=notty mode? >>> >>>In both environments, BRLTTY works with 1.7.9. >> >> So are you claiming that Corinna's change caused the problem or did you >> see this with other snapshots? > >I did a test with 20110624, and BRLTTY doesn't work there either. Sorry >for the confusion. Corinnas patch looks perfect. > >Let's wait for Samuel to comment, since he is contributing to the BRLTTY >development team. Since neither Corinna nor I know how to run brltty we really need some insight here. strace output for working and nonworking cases would be useful, I guess. Please be sure to use the most recent (i.e., at least 2011-07-10) snapshot when testing. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple