X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:58:55 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: pthread_sigmask bug Message-ID: <20110709065855.GB29867@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4E178FD6 DOT 5010101 AT redhat DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E178FD6.5010101@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jul 8 17:16, Eric Blake wrote: > The current implementation of pthread_sigmask violates POSIX: > > extern "C" int > pthread_sigmask (int operation, const sigset_t *set, sigset_t *old_set) > { > return handle_sigprocmask (operation, set, old_set, _my_tls.sigmask); > } > > POSIX requires that sigprocmask returns -1 and sets errno on failure, > but that pthread_sigmask returns a positive error value on failure (and > for QoI leaves errno untouched). > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/sigprocmask.html PTC? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple