X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_RX,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Dieter Subject: vi in rxvt-Session really slow Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 22 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello, I've downloaded cygwin including the rxvt-Terminal. The local terminal with bash works great, but when I connect in a rxvt-Window to a remote-Server via ssh and run there "vi", the vi-startup needs a few seconds... When I use the simple Bash-Shell in the Windows-Command-Window then vi is much faster (it opens the file instantly). Also closing vi by ":q!" needs more time when using rxvt than simple-bash. Why is remote vi so slow when I use rxvt? Would that be better if I use xterm (currently not installed)? Additional information: I had to set export TERM=cygwin in my ~/.bashrc - otherwise the remote host answers "unknown terminal type, falling back to 'dumb'" or "WARNING: terminal is not fully functional" Rgds Dieter -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple