X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: lars AT lamasti DOT net (Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rndal?=) To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Emacs and removal of CYGWIN=tty References: <4E0C62D6 DOT 3060901 AT cornell DOT edu> <20110630115403 DOT GH4471 AT const DOT bordeaux DOT inria DOT fr> <20110630140836 DOT GG9552 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110706071951 DOT GC23717 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:03:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20110706071951.GC23717@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:19:51 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com [Corinna Vinschen] > What I don't get from your reply is if you are comparing the latest > snapshot against 1.7.9 with CYGWIN=tty mode, or if you're comparing > to another snapshot in default console mode. Oh, I'm sorry. Tested against the 1.7.9 version. Lars -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple