X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=G6Q69DB3AUoJKS2BpLRaz8MQ2NORN7h5HRzrJMPOhRw= c=1 sm=1 a=IzDsJS3ZcTgA:10 a=gkZ03UMtN5AA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=lm4rf8pw1hzmFPYkgo0DwQ==:17 a=iVxlzXCMTOGnLzU8ZKMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lm4rf8pw1hzmFPYkgo0DwQ==:117 Message-ID: <4DF5CF06.5010701@charter.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:49:10 -0400 From: SJ Wright User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin User Mailing List Subject: We have a "cygstart" -- why not a "cygstop"? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Or does such an idea go too much against the grain of "let's keep Cygwin as much of a Unix as possible?" At the very least, it would cut through all the rigamorole of "kill"-ing pids that were likely to return errors. Comments? SJ Wright -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple