X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110609210632.GA1457@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20110609094631 DOT 56364lzi64m7t4d3 AT messagerie DOT si DOT c-s DOT fr> <4DF10C13 DOT 3040208 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <811AA35F-E300-46E5-9FE3-EE7D5E58194B AT free DOT fr> <20110609210632 DOT GA1457 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> From: Edward McGuire Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:01:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > We're not changing anything. Having the date there is useful. > > Again: you shouldn't use "cygcheck -s" as a method to find the system > date. While strictly true, I doubt that continuing to repeat this caution will be worthwhile. You pointed out that having the date there is useful. I won't try to mind-read the OP's purpose, but I don't suppose it was simply to display the date, and I do suppose it is better served now that he knows how to get the date right. Cheers, MetaEd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple