X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4DF10C13.3040208@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:08:19 -0400 From: Charles Wilson Reply-To: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ References: <20110609094631 DOT 56364lzi64m7t4d3 AT messagerie DOT si DOT c-s DOT fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 6/9/2011 1:39 PM, Edward McGuire wrote: > So cygcheck(1) is honoring TZ, but it trips over a pathname in a > way that date(1) does not. cygcheck.exe is not a cygwin program. It is a native windows program, and thus either (a) uses Windows support for time zone data, not cygwin, or (b) has some special code to mimic cygwin's tz handling, which may not be up-to-par. You'll have to check the source code to be sure, but I rather doubt (b). -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple