X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: CYGWIN=tty round 2 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 21:53:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110522211906.GA13428@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20110522211906 DOT GA13428 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1306119201.4572.4.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 17:19 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I don't think we saw anyone step forward with a valid reason why they > needed to use CYGWIN=tty over something like "mintty". > > I've summarized the thread where Corinna asked why people used CYGWIN=tty > over CYGWIN=notty below. > > I don't see any showstoppers here so unless people can provide specific > examples of how this change would cause hardwhip, we'll be removing > CYGWIN=tty in a snapshot near you soon. I could add XWin: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9763 And once again, using mintty is a solution. Since mintty is the solution to so many of these scenarios, shouldn't we make it the default terminal (IOW add mintty to Base and replace the Cygwin.bat shortcut with mintty's)? The status quo just encourages people to use a deficient terminal without any idea that a better one exists. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple