X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: Mike Dahmus <mdahmus AT potomacfusion DOT com>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:25:48 -0500
Subject: RE: Repeated problems with svn even after rebaseall and peflagsall on Windows 7
Message-ID: <688D8B269DCBDE44A466DC43D403624C0155CCFE40@pfi-mail>
References: <20110517011110 DOT GA22552 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20110517011110.GA22552@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Nope, didn't help; in fact, the rebase at 0x77000000 (whatever the recommen=
dation was) broke things much worse; and now even bash won't start without =
a million access violations.

Why is this even necessary anyways? Other than "because it's always been th=
is way"? I've been as stalwart a defender of cygwin as you'd find at my var=
ious companies over the years but this wart is getting really hard to ignor=
e. In particular, since I myself can't do subversion or various other thing=
s any more without devolving to something like (ugh) tortoise.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple