X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110510165655.GA26641@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20110506144312 DOT GA4857 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110510165655 DOT GA26641 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:43:13 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: All clear (was Re: Don't use 2011-05-05 22:37:25 UTC snapshot) From: Chris Sutcliffe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10 May 2011 12:56, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:43:12AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Last night's snapshot has a revamp of some of the tty/console handling. >>It worked fine on my Windows 7 x64 system but apparently I was just >>lucky. =A0Please don't use it until you hear from me that things are >>fixed. > > Any tty/console handling problems that were in this snapshot should > now be fixed. =A0So it is ok to start using snapshots again. Does this include the 2011-05-06 snapshot, or should I wait until the next one is generated? Thank you, Chris --=20 Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple