X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-SMTPAuthUserID: ab2325 Message-ID: From: "Lee Maschmeyer" To: "Lee Maschmeyer" , References: <20110509161028 DOT GJ27739 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110509175205 DOT GA5069 AT const DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20110509200524 DOT GB10705 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <654F3CDDAF0546FB9A0BA923298D8183 AT cit DOT wayne DOT edu> Subject: Re: Who's using "CYGWIN=tty" and why? Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:44:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com There is no need for CYGWIN=tty as far as my use of brltty is concerned. I can still run c:\cygwin\cygwin.bat having taken out the tty from the CYGWIN var. If I discover massive emacs malfunctions I can always defect to the vim camp. :-) I'm curious why the tty command in mintty reports /dev/tty but that's by-the-by and probably belongs in a different thread anyway. -- Lee Maschmeyer Wayne State University Computing Center 5925 Woodward, #281 Detroit MI 48202 USA -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple