X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4DC818D3.3020602@sidefx.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:39:47 -0400 From: Edward Lam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Who's using "CYGWIN=tty" and why? References: <20110509161028 DOT GJ27739 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20110509161028.GJ27739@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 5/9/2011 12:10 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Chris and I are wondering how many people are using the Windows console > as local console window in CYGWIN=tty mode and why. I'm not but there's various references to it it the web about it being requires for Emacs. eg. http://blog.arithm.com/2007/12/01/killing-cygwin-emacs/ I hope that these references are outdated with Cygwin 1.7? The other references to it I see are about requiring tty mode for sshd. This is also for historical reasons but I'm not sure if we still need it in Cygwin 1.7. -Edward -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple