X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Dan Grayson Subject: Re: untarring symlinks with ../ fails randomly Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20110424121145 DOT GB30696 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110426074325 DOT GP3324 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110426152226 DOT GA22801 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110426155346 DOT GA19578 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4DB83C35 DOT 8040808 AT redhat DOT com> <4DB8409E DOT 2030004 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake redhat.com> writes: ... > > > No, because they don't use ctime the way that cygwin1.dll uses ctime. > They probably have other hacks in their port of tar to work around lack > of POSIX features that cygwin1.dll is emulating. Do you mean that the implementation of ctime in cygwin1.dll might be improvable? How is it implemented? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple