X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DB83C35.8040808@redhat.com> References: <20110424121145 DOT GB30696 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110426074325 DOT GP3324 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110426152226 DOT GA22801 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110426155346 DOT GA19578 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4DB83C35 DOT 8040808 AT redhat DOT com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:10:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: untarring symlinks with ../ fails randomly From: David Boyce To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > I think the patch should remain cygwin-only, and not go upstream. What about native Windows builds of GNU tar such as GnuWin32? Wouldn't they benefit from a (suitably conditionalized) patch too? DSB -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple