X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: bob 295 <icanprogram AT 295 DOT ca>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: needed feature in Cygwin fifos
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:31:19 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201104261431.21330.icanprogram@295.ca>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

>On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:34:16PM -0400, bob 295 wrote:
>>I recognize that Cygwin fifos are "buggy and not suitable for anything but 
>>simplest of applications",  however in the spirit of seeing if things can be 
>>improved here is some more test code which illustrates one of the "bugs".

>Maybe I need to be clearer: I don't need demonstrations of bugs.  I know
>what doesn't work.

>The fifo layer needs a total rewrite right now.  Sending this type of email
>is a waste of your time.

>cgf

Fair enough.   Is that total rewrite underway?  If so any idea when we'll see 
a workable version?  If not what would it take to expedite things?  More 
developer resources?  What type of skillset would you need?

Thanks again.

bob


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple