X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:21:37 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Memory leak in select Message-ID: <20110420132137.GC5842@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4DAC23E3 DOT 2020005 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4DAC2D35 DOT 5070106 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4DAC4B6A DOT 50101 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <20110418152441 DOT GA12913 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20110418152801 DOT GA11182 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4DAC8F96 DOT 3080808 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <4DADFF3A DOT 1060006 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <20110420011057 DOT GA453 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 20 15:16, Thomas Stalder wrote: > Hello, > > I just have a question, the same change would it not necessary for the > functions: serial_cleanup, mailslot_cleanup and socket_cleanup in > select.cc (like attached patch) ? > > I don't know, it's just a question. The patch are not tested. Maybe you should actually test it. There's a good chance that it fixes your memory issue. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple