X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:47:06 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: emacs No Longer Works After A Cygwin Upgrade Message-ID: <20110418204706.GA26913@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4DAC987F DOT 2090502 AT tundraware DOT com> <4DAC9EA6 DOT 1080104 AT cornell DOT edu> <20110418203001 DOT GA12413 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4DACA0B9 DOT 7020807 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DACA0B9.7020807@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:36:09PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >On 4/18/2011 4:30 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:27:18PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >>> On 4/18/2011 4:02 PM, marco atzeri wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>>>> This has happened the last few times I did an upgrade with setup.exe. >>>>> emacs, emacs-nox, and emacs -nw will not start at all. Xemacs works >>>>> fine. >>>>> >>>>> Previously, I was able to work around this by falling back to a >>>>> previous version of emacs, but this too seems broken now. >>>>> >>>>> Ideas? >>>> >>>> http://cygwin.com/problems.html >>> >>> While we're waiting for a full problem report, I'll make my best guess: >>> The OP needs to run rebaseall. >> >> And possibly also a "cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs.exe" right? > >Yes, but without the ".exe". (/usr/bin/emacs is a symlink that resolves >to either emacs-X11.exe or emacs-nox.exe.) Ah, right. In that case, it would probably be best to do: cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs-nox.exe I don't think cygcheck can resolve a symlink. (I'm not near a Windows machine to test right now) cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple