X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4DA589A3.7040300@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:31:47 +0100 From: Jon TURNEY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: latest emacs, cygwin, and constant stackdumps References: <4D91DDEA DOT 6010303 AT cornell DOT edu> <4D91F9AB DOT 6030202 AT cornell DOT edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 13/04/2011 02:02, Dan Tsafrir wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 18:24, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 3/29/2011 9:26 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >>> >>> On 3/29/2011 8:48 AM, J. David Boyd wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm not certain of the exact version of these, but they are the latest, >>>> as I upgrade at least once a week. >>>> >>>> Lately, everytime I do almost anything in emacs, the terminal I started >>>> it from shows: >>>> >>>> [main] emacs-X11 4500 exception::handle: Exception: >>>> STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION >>>> 1149 [main] emacs-X11 4500 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to >>>> emacs-X11.exe.stackdump > > I've been experiencing exactly the same symptoms. > >>> Also, it might make sense to update your Cygwin installation first, >>> since new versions of cygwin and and xorg-server were just released today. >>> >>> Finally, please tell me if the problem occurs with both emacs-23.3-1 and >>> the test release emacs-23.3-2. > > I've updated cygwin, installed emacs-23.3-2, and followed the instructions in: > > http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html#q-status-access-violation > > None of it helped. > >> Another thought: Have you tried rebaseall?. > > rebaseall indeed eliminated the problem for me. Thanks! A confusing pair of statements: That FAQ points you at FAQ 9.16, which tells you that rebasing may solve the problem. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple