X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:25:49 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /etc/apache.new? Message-ID: <20110401202548.GD1577@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <2AAA0D500DE14145BC643B30E8505C2D AT cit DOT wayne DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2AAA0D500DE14145BC643B30E8505C2D@cit.wayne.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:18:57PM -0400, Lee Maschmeyer wrote: >Hi folks, > >I recently had to reinstall Cygwin. 900 apps showed up as incomplete in the >cygcheck -srv output. Go figure; I obviously did something wrong somewhere. >:-) > >Anyway, I'm getting the wrinkles out. There are no more incomplete packages. >In looking at /etc I see both apache and apache.new directories. diff -r >shows that the contents are identical. Will cygcheck get mad if I rename >apache.new to apache, or are both supposed to be there? If you're concerned about this then rename /etc/apache to /etc/ilikepie and /etc/apache.new to /etc/apache . Then see if cygcheck complains. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple