X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-SMTPAuthUserID: ab2325
Message-ID: <2AAA0D500DE14145BC643B30E8505C2D@cit.wayne.edu>
From: "Lee Maschmeyer" <lee_maschmeyer AT wayne DOT edu>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: /etc/apache.new?
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:18:57 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	format=flowed;	charset="iso-8859-1";	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi folks,

I recently had to reinstall Cygwin. 900 apps showed up as incomplete in the 
cygcheck -srv output. Go figure; I obviously did something wrong somewhere. 
:-)

Anyway, I'm getting the wrinkles out. There are no more incomplete packages. 
In looking at /etc I see both apache and apache.new directories. diff -r 
shows that the contents are identical. Will cygcheck get mad if I rename 
apache.new to apache, or are both supposed to be there?

Thanks,

-- 
Lee Maschmeyer
Wayne State University Computing Center
5925 Woodward, #281
Detroit MI 48202
USA 


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple