X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D95CF8D.7080904@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:13:49 -0700 From: Daniel Colascione User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Fork issues with long command lines and long $PATH References: <4D5BB1F1 DOT 1060603 AT smarterphone DOT com> <20110217102703 DOT GA30224 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4D7A16B4 DOT 1000802 AT gmail DOT com> <20110311152221 DOT GA4645 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20110311152221.GA4645@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/11/2011 7:22 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:33:56AM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote: >> On 2/17/11 2:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> There's no way >>> to start a process and tell the Windows loader where you want the stack. >> >> True, but there's also no requirement to use the stack provided by the >> loader. Why not always allocate a separate stack and switch to it early >> in initialization? > > Taking control of the stack allocation doesn't mean that you will > magically be able to allocate space in the same address range in a > forked process. What about using a large area of BSS as "stack"? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple