X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_PD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D941587.9010204@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:47:51 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells References: <4D93C65F DOT 4020007 AT laposte DOT net> <1301539636 DOT 1416 DOT 2 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> In-Reply-To: <1301539636.1416.2.camel@YAAKOV04> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/30/2011 10:47 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >> /etc/shells is missing some shells : >> >> /bin/ash >> /bin/csh >> /bin/mksh >> /usr/bin/ash >> /usr/bin/csh >> /usr/bin/mksh >> >> and maybe more ? > > ash is just a copy of dash, and csh is a symlink to tcsh. However, you > are certainly correct about adding mksh, possibly removing the obsolete > pdksh in the process. I'll put it on the TODO list for the next update. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple