X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_PD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <4D93C65F.4020007@laposte.net> References: <4D93C65F DOT 4020007 AT laposte DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:47:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1301539636.1416.2.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > /etc/shells is missing some shells : > > /bin/ash > /bin/csh > /bin/mksh > /usr/bin/ash > /usr/bin/csh > /usr/bin/mksh > > and maybe more ? ash is just a copy of dash, and csh is a symlink to tcsh. However, you are certainly correct about adding mksh, possibly removing the obsolete pdksh in the process. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple