X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1301088657-2864051d0001-w5GHUG X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Illia DOT Bobyr AT ronin-capital DOT com From: Illia Bobyr To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:30:34 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: IFS not fixing carriage returns Subject: Re: IFS not fixing carriage returns Message-ID: <4D8D097A.9020103@ronin-capital.com> References: In-Reply-To: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.106.240.22] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1301088657 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam01.roncap.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/25/2011 11:35 AM, Tim McDaniel wrote: > > I have tried Googling for info on this, but there are a lot of false > hits ... > > [...] > > Although it's not documented in "man bash" on the latest Cygwin, I did > find "set -o igncr" and it seems to work well. > > But I'm just curious about why my first attempt didn't work. > > [...] > > Anyone have any ideas on why IFS doesn't work to deal with carriage > returns? > > (Note that adding carriage return to IFS is still an inferior notion > to "set -o igncr". IFSing would effectively put a space at the end of > each line, so I expect that > line arg1 arg2 arg3 \ > arg4 arg5 > would not work. I would also exspect here-documents like > some pipe < line1 > line2 > EOF > would need their carriage returns stripped. In contrast, "set -o > igncr" strips carriage returns even in these contexts, so they work > as-is. I'm asking about IFS merely because I'm curious.) > bug-bash AT gnu DOT org might be a better place to ask questions like this. It is essentially a question on how the bash internally works. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple