X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D8A4CAC.2020106@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:40:28 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cyggfortran-3.dll broken ? References: <4D8A1775 DOT 5020601 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A1BCD DOT 2080506 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A214D DOT 6090409 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D8A2683 DOT 1010009 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A2E5F DOT 1040204 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4D8A32B6 DOT 9050507 AT gmail DOT com> <4D8A472C DOT 7040708 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <4D8A472C.7040708@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 23/03/2011 19:17, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 3/23/2011 1:49 PM, Dave Korn wrote: >> Hmm, I should probably do this. And send it upstream too. > > Well, yeah (but does upstream want to explicitly require cygwin-1.7.8 or > better? or would you conditionalize it on a configure test: The latter, certainly. I had a quick try in my 4.3.4-4 build dir; it's a simple matter of adding an extra.def file to the linker flags along with a counterbalancing '--export-all-symbols' (and since we have a .map file as well this doesn't over-export, so I don't need to make a complete .def file, handy!) and I could conditionalize it on any one of the new HAVE_xxx definitions that are what's causing libgfortan to exclude its own implementations in the new build, so it doesn't seem like it should be too hard. I need to concentrate on fixing LTO for binutils 2.21.1 before I do anything else. Apologies to Marco but unless the problem gets worse I'm going back to that and testing the gcc-4.6.0 RC2 for the next few days. I'll try and find some background time in which to respin 4.3.4 with forwarders added to the DLL. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple