X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,TW_FD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:08:04 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: python select() is limited to fds < 64 Message-ID: <20110322200804.GA22409@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4D88F89B DOT 6000308 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <4D88FE3E DOT 2070607 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D88FE3E.2070607@sh.cvut.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:53:34PM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: >Jon TURNEY wrote, On 22.3.2011 20:29: >> >> python seems to be built with the default value of FD_SETSIZE, which is only >> 64 on cygwin. >Is this not because of the inherent limitation of WaitForMultipleObjects() call? Yep. Without a rewrite, it's a hard limit to Cygwin's select(). cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple