X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MAY_BE_FORGED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D876770.2090006@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:57:52 +0100 From: Erwin Waterlander User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin + GetConsoleOutputCP References: <4D8651F2 DOT 3000200 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20110321111746 DOT GP31220 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4D8756ED DOT 7010800 AT xs4all DOT nl> <4D8764BD DOT 4060108 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <4D8764BD.4060108@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 03/21/2011 03:46 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > Hmm. So we have a choice for the cygwin version, for choosing the > default dos cp when the user specifies -iso and doesn't explicitly > specify the cp: either > 1) follow the unix behavior: just simply default to -437. > 2) follow the dos behavior: use GetConsoleOutputCP() as currently > coded. > 3) Do something completely different, and use GetACP(). > 4) Do something completely different, and use nl_langinfo or setlocale. > > I think #3 is a bad idea, since it creates a new semantic just /because/. > > #4 would make sense if we were designing from scratch -- but then, we'd > really just be re-implementing iconv(1). I don't think that's a > valuable exercise, and besides: > >> There is no intention to add other conversions. And I don't plan to >> remove the options in the near future. > I think I lean towards #1 for this specific corner case. In general, > cygwin ports should act like their unix conterparts, even if there is a > "native" win32 port with different semantics, IMO. > Hi, I agree with you. Same as Linux is better on Cygwin. SunOS dos2unix determined the code page on non-i386 systems via the keyboard type (See http://manpages.unixforum.co.uk/man-pages/unix/solaris-10-11_06/1/dos2unix-man-page.html). I didn't want to implement that and defaulted to cp437, which is also default on i386 SunOS. Erwin -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple