X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fedora Cygwin RPM repository From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <20110314095945.GA356@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <1299994671 DOT 5080 DOT 21 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20110313113654 DOT GA22542 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1300076662 DOT 3440 DOT 15 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <20110314095945 DOT GA356 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:48:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1300168123.5388.13.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:59 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 13 23:24, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > I just added a cygwin-binutils-devel package with the necessary headers > > and static libraries. > > > > The only trick is you need to manually > > remove /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/libiberty.a so that the "correct" > > libiberty.a is used instead until I have the chance to rebuild > > cygwin-gcc. > > Thanks! cygwin-gcc 4.5.1-2 is now available for both arches without libiberty.a. > > I tried that at first, but it didn't work. The problem is with > > binutils: > > > > $ i686-pc-cygwin-strings /usr/bin/i686-pc-cygwin-ld.bfd | grep w32api > > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/w32api"); > > I don't quite understand how this matches the current installation. > Right now the w32api libs are in sys-root/usr/lib, not in lib. I'm sure > I'm missing something. For a cygwin-target cross-compiler, binutils' ld/configure.tgt hard-codes $(tooldir)/lib/w32api as an additional library directory. While technically valid, is it not where we want libraries to be when using a sysroot. I added a small patch to binutils[1] to add sys-root/usr/lib/w32api and have rebuilt cygwin-binutils and cygwin-w32api accordingly. HTH, Yaakov P.S. I see that you already used this to fix the gcc-4.5 warnings in winsup/cygwin, but you only applied those to your post-1.7.9 branch. Any chance you could commit those to HEAD now as well? [1] http://fedora-cygwin.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=fedora-cygwin/cygwin-binutils;a=blob;f=w32api-sysroot.patch;h=a996aef;hb=49213c4 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple